In-House Evidence of Efficacy in Chronic Pain Management
Evaluation of Our Approach's Effectiveness
Since our inception, we have systematically gathered data on the effectiveness of our proprietary approach in alleviating chronic pain. Between our start and July 2024, we have worked with 230 individuals who met the criteria for our methods. Out of these, 193 have completed the process, providing us with substantial data on outcomes. Our findings (Figure 1.) reveal that close to 93% of participants achieved significant improvements in the frequency and intensity of their discomfort, with nearly 60% reporting complete freedom from pain and symptoms across various chronic conditions. Notably, among those with back pain, over 70% reported being completely pain-free.
Participant Demographics and Methodology
Participants were drawn from a diverse demographic, ranging in age from children with guardian assistance to adults aged 78. The participant pool included individuals from various occupational backgrounds, such as desk workers, manual laborers, and high-performance athletes. The severity of symptoms ranged from mild discomfort, which occasionally brought slight limitations, to debilitating pain that severely impacted quality of life and had previously resisted numerous treatment attempts. For the purpose of this analysis, only the most dominant symptom was considered. In almost all cases, our work was only concluded once the client's primary symptom and any related symptoms affecting their well-being were resolved. The methodology involved a thorough assessment of each participant's symptom history, previous diagnoses, and treatment attempts. Sessions, ranging from 5 to 16 in number, were tailored to the individual's needs and focused on modulating nerve pathways. Interventions were personalised and included both in-session and between-session strategies to maximise efficacy. Long-term follow-ups were conducted in all cases to ensure that the results were not due to a placebo effect and were enduring. Outcome measures focused on changes in pain intensity and frequency using standardised assessment scales.
Results
The outcomes of our approach are summarised in the table below, illustrating significant reductions in pain and discomfort across various conditions. The data distinctly categorises participants into three groups: those who achieved full relief, those who experienced significant improvements, and those who showed no substantial change. Participants classified in the "pain-free" group reported a complete return to full function, having ceased all other efforts aimed at managing their discomfort. These individuals returned to full activity, regaining complete bodily function. Long-term follow-ups revealed that the majority maintained this pain-free state, often resuming activities they had previously thought were unattainable. The second group, which showed significant improvement, surpassed their initial expectations, regaining substantial bodily function with minimal limitations. While they occasionally experienced flare-ups, the intensity, frequency, and duration of these episodes were significantly reduced, allowing them to confidently discontinue sessions. However, we categorised them separately from the pain-free group due to our rigorous standards, which recognise that residual discomfort may persist and naturally diminish over time. This is corroborated by long-term follow-ups, where participants in this group reported continued improvement despite occasional setbacks.The final category includes those who did not experience significant changes or whose results were not sustained after the sessions. Our analysis indicates that individuals who regularly engaged in invasive treatments or manual therapies, particularly chiropractic care, faced more challenges in achieving the desired outcomes. Conversely, those who were referred by a close contact, committed to the program, and actively participated in regular updates showed the fastest and most consistent improvements. Notably, we found no significant correlation between previous diagnoses, such as MRI findings or musculoskeletal imbalances, and the efficacy of our approach.
The "Other" category in the table includes individuals with primary conditions such as knee pain, fibromyalgia, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders, gut issues, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and dystonia. Additionally, many participants experienced one or more secondary conditions, such as wrist pain, plantar fasciitis, trigeminal neuralgia, chronic tendinitis, and other neurological issues, many of which were also resolved but are not included in this assessment.
Clients were asked to rate their symptoms throughout the sessions on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no symptoms and 10 representing unbearable pain. The graph illustrates how pain ratings fluctuated across different sessions. Conditions such as back pain, migraines, neck pain, and shoulder pain are represented separately, while all other conditions are grouped under the "Other" category. The averages for each condition were calculated at various sessions, resulting in the depicted trends.
t's important to note that session frequency varied among clients, so the number of sessions was used as the metric rather than time. The rate of improvement differed, with some clients experiencing initial flare-ups before symptom reduction—a pattern observed in other nerve pathway modulation approaches. Additionally, many clients reported improvements in overall comfort, mobility, strength, and flexibility, even in areas not directly targeted during sessions.
Discussion and Interpretation
While our original aim was not to conduct a formal study, the data collected offers valuable insights into the efficacy of our approach. The results provide hope for those seeking relief from chronic pain and strongly affirm the effectiveness of nerve pathway modulation, particularly in cases where tissue damage is not a primary factor. Compared to existing studies on similar conditions, our outcomes appear slightly superior, likely due to our rigorous client selection process and customised recovery plans.These findings highlight the potential for lasting solutions in chronic pain management, surpassing the limitations of traditional methods. Although our data isn't directly comparable to clinical trials, it suggests a significant advancement in treatment efficacy, aligning with and often exceeding the results of studies supporting nerve pathway modulation. Both groups—those achieving complete pain relief and those with significant relief—have shown freedom from the cycle of pain management, with a return to full function and no need for ongoing maintenance.By encouraging practitioners to explore this innovative approach, we aim to foster a collaborative effort in advancing chronic pain management solutions that are not only effective but also sustainable and empowering for chronic pain sufferers.